Is Google+ More Facebook or More Twitter? Yes

Quick, what existing social network is Google+ most likely to displace in terms of people’s time?

Another Try by Google to Take On Facebook

Claire Cain Miller, New York Times

This isn’t a Facebook-killer, it’s a Twitter-killer.

Yishan Wong, Google+ post

A hearty congrats to Google for creating an offering that manages to be compared to both Facebook and Twitter. The initial press focused on Google+ as a Facebook competitor. But as people have gotten to play with it, more and more they are realizing that it’s just as much a Twitter competitor.

I wanted to understand how that’s possible. How is it Google+ competes with both of those services? To do so, I plotted Google+’s features against comparable features in both Facebook and Twitter. The objective was to understand:

  • Why are people thinking of Google+ as competitor to both existing social networks?
  • How did the Google team make use of the best of both services?

The chart below is shows where Google+ is more like Facebook or Twitter. The red check marks () and gray shading highlight which service a Google+ feature is more like.

A few notes about the chart.

Circles for tracking: Twitter has a very comparable feature with its Lists. Facebook also lets you put connections into lists; I know because I’ve put connections into lists (e.g. Family, High School, etc.). But I had a hard time figuring out where those lists are. in the Facebook UI. Seriously, where are they for accessing? They may be available somewhere, but it’s not readily accessible. So I didn’t consider Facebook as offering this as a core experience.

+1 voting on posts: Both Google+ and Facebook allow up votes on people’s posts.Twitter has the ‘favorite’ feature. Which is sort of like up voting. But not really. It’s not visible to others, and it’s more a bookmarking feature.

Posts in web search results: Google+ posts, the public ones, show up in Google search results. Not surprising there. Tweets do as well. Facebook posts for the most part do not. I understand some posts on public pages can. But the vast majority of Wall posts never show up in web search results.

Google+ One-Way Following Defines Its Experience

When you look at the chart above, on a strict feature count, Google+ is more like Facebook. It’s got comment threading, video chat,  inline media, and limited sharing.

But for me, the core defining design of Google+ is the one-way following. I can follow anyone on Google+. They may not follow back (er…put me in a circle), but I can see their public posts. This one-way following is what makes the experience more like Twitter for me. Knowing your public posts are out there for anyone to find and read is both boon and caution. For instance, I’ll post pics of my kids on Facebook, because I know who can see those pics – the people I’ve connected with. I don’t tend to post their pics on Twitter. Call me an old fashioned protective parent.

That’s my initial impression. Now as Google+ circles gain ground in terms of usage, they will become the Facebook equivalent of two-way following. Things like sharing and +mentions are issues that are hazy to me right now. Can someone reshare my “circle-only” post to others outside my circle? Do I have to turn off reshare every time? Does +mentioning someone outside my circle make them aware of the post?

Google has created quite a powerful platform here. While most features are not new innovations per se, Google+ benefits from the experience of both Twitter and Facebook. They’re off to a good start.

I’m @bhc3 on Twitter.


About Hutch Carpenter
Chief Scientist Revolution Credit

31 Responses to Is Google+ More Facebook or More Twitter? Yes

  1. gxgraham says:

    Thanks for the post. Good information. I don’t feel the need for another social media, but you’ve piqued my interest.

  2. Pingback: Is Google+ More Facebook or More Twitter? Yes | SiliconANGLE

  3. Pingback: A first look at Google Plus | Web Up the Newsroom

  4. Pingback: +1 in Google Plus is not a Google Search Plus « Pest Control Marketing & such…

  5. thos003 says:

    Good read. I like the graphic. Just a couple of quick points. Twitter favorites do show: (!/Thos003/favorites ) and you can get notifications when you tweets are favorited. …but I agree not quite the same as likes and +1.

    My other question is on the Google Plus showing in search results… Do you have a screen shot of this? I would love more info on it. Thanks.

  6. Pingback: Aktuelles 14. Juli 2011

  7. seppo0010 says:

    Resharing is also possible on Facebook. E.g.:

  8. Pingback: Today’s Reading List – Google+ Plus Edition

  9. Pingback: My social experiment | Purple Girl's Blog

  10. Pingback: Google Circles Anyone?

  11. Pingback: The Google+ Hype

  12. Stuart Miniman says:

    Hey Hutch,
    Nice feature analysis, but what I think it’s a bit early to say for G+ is: what are people really doing on the tool?
    Twitter has always been a very eclectic mix – promotional tool, conference chat room, networking conduit. One of Facebook’s killer usages has been photo sharing (with tagging and comments). G+ is very open ended. Without search (which we’ve been assured is coming), I don’t see it competing with Twitter (although it is having a visible impact on the Tweet traffic from the Silicon Valley early adopters). And the competition with Facebook is basically being a place where the same tech crowd can go do similar things to Facebook without the family or “high school friends”. We’ll see how sustainable the engagement is. Of course an iPhone/iPad app would make me more likely to update more.

    • There’s little things they need to do. For instance, I’d love to find “re-shares” of posts, which is easy with the Twitter equivalent retweet. Search will be good (and could solve finding the shares). There is a FriendFeed aspect to Google+, and remember FriendFeed was the darling of the SV crowd for a while. Until it wasn’t.

  13. Pingback: [DE] Ist Google+ das Ende von Twitter? « Digital Naiv – Stefan63's Blog

  14. Pingback: Matthias Rückel » Blog Archive » Die sozialen Vier (Teil 1)

  15. Pingback: This Week in Review: Murdoch’s mess keeps growing, aggregation ethics, and giving context to Google+ » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism

  16. Pingback: This Week in Review: Murdoch’s mess keeps growing, aggregation ethics, and giving context to Google+ « OMCIM: Medios cultura de la paz y la legalidad

  17. Pingback: Facebook vs. Google plus aus Usability-Sicht | – Online Produktmanagement & Digitale Medien

  18. Pingback: Facebook vs Google+ vs Twitter

  19. Pingback: Google+ Diskussion - Seite 45 -

  20. Pingback: Google+ Facebook Twitter Feature Comparison Infographic | The Chris Voss Show

  21. Pingback: Google+ Facebook Twitter Feature Comparison Infographic | The Social Media News

  22. Pingback: #hottoppix for July 18, 2011 | e1evation, llc

  23. ron says:

    The chart above indicates that Google+ should be better than Twitter and Facebook, but history has shown that the better mouse trap does not always win. Twitter and Facebook have the first mover advantage and a very large established user base, Google+ must bring a new innovative idea to the table.

  24. I’s day Google + is more like a mix between Facebook and Twitter. Or, i’d say, it is Facebook with the privacy of a Twitter.

  25. guerrajoaquim says:

    good information to make difference between them. Helpfull for my classes. Thanks!

  26. Pingback: Deadra Flournay

  27. Pingback: صراع العمالقة (عن مواقع التواصل الاجتماعى) | مهاويس نظم

  28. Google+ is actually pretty amazing, just needs a couple tweaks but it’s pretty fun.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: