Entrepreneurship as Signal: Quitting Facebook to Tackle Enterprise 2.0
October 6, 2008 9 Comments
In a recent post, Fred Wilson had this to say about Enterprise 2.0:
This is one of the reasons we’ve struggled so hard to invest in “enterprise 2.0” at Union Square Ventures. We have tried pretty hard to find companies that we can invest in that bring the new web technologies to the enterprise, but often we’ve found what happens is that consumers (ie employees) bring the web technologies they use every day to work and they prefer that.
I understand the sentiment, but I’m not really agreeing with Fred on this one. Corporate employees don’t use their Gmail and Yahoo Mail in lieu of their company’s Microsoft Outlook application. It’s really a matter of making an application that solves some key issues and has an appropriate experience for what it needs to accomplish.
But Fred’s opinion is interesting in the context of Friday’s news that two key Facebook executives are leaving the company “to build an extensible enterprise productivity suite”. They plan to leverage many of the conventions of Facebook for this new company.
Enterprise 2.0? Are they crazy?
Enterprise Software Is So Boring
- “Business software like that from Oracle, SAP, Microsoft etc makes a TON of money.”
- “I know that when I talk about enterprise software the numbers of viewers just don’t show up. So, tech bloggers quickly learn that if they talk about enterprise software they aren’t going to get many advertising impressions.”
Michael Arrington of Techcrunch said the same thing in this tweet in April:
“@dahowlett enterprise is boring. no way around it. people just don’t care.”
Nick O’Neill wrote this about the Facebook execs’ departure:
“Apparently Rosenstein and Moskovitz are leaving to create an enterprise level productivity software package. Sounds thrilling doesn’t it?”
Rosenstein and Moskovitz are deeply ingrained at Facebook. They’ve been there for a while, and have seen it blossom as the go-to social network. They’ve were there for the heady valuation of $15 billion. The pre-IPO company still has work in front of it, but surely it’s pretty interesting.
So what do they do? They quit to go start a BORING enterprise software company.
What could this possibly tell us?
Entrepreneurship As Signal
Here’s one clue for why the Facebook guys would quit to start their own Enterprise 2.0 company:
Social networking inside the enterprise is expected to dominate spending in the category. And what is Facebook? The most successful consumer social network.
The Enterprise 2.0 market is still quite nascent and fragmented. Combine that industry profile with projected spending in the category, and suddenly you understand why these guys are striking out on their own.
It’s not an easy market to crack, and working inside the enterprise is much different from working out on the Web. Looking forward to watching their progress.