About these ads

The Revenue Impact of Enterprise 2.0


I recently read a great study that looked at the impact of social networks inside companies. Information, Technology and Information Worker Productivity was written by academics at MIT, NYU and BU. The authors analyzed the social graph of employees for a 14-office midsize executive recruiting firm.

The firm didn’t actually have a social networking application in-house. It was all email. But what the authors did is look at the email connections of workers to extrapolate their social graphs. And what they found was enlightening.

I encourage you to read the study itself, as it has a wealth of good information in it. I’ll call out my favorite observations from the report:

A one standard deviation increase in betweenness centrality in the email network is associated with approximately $76,000 greater revenue output per year controlling for human capital, demographic variables and use of the ESS system.

A one standard deviation increase in network diversity is associated with approximately $83,000 greater annual revenue output.

Betweenness centrality: What’s the probability that an individual will fall on the shortest path between any two other individuals? This attribute measures the strength of an individual’s connections to other employees. Sort of a probability-based LinkedIn.

Network diversity: Measures the degree to which an individual’s contacts are connected to each other. If your social network consists of people who all know each other well, your network diversity is low. If your social network has a lot of connections that don’t know one another, your diversity is high.

Here’s what the network diversity impact looks like graphically:

The folks with the best access to a diverse set of opinions, knowledge and perspectives outperformed their peers.

How Do You Make These Findings Actionable Across the Organization

The author’s looked at the connections people had built on their own, and those who had the best, most diverse networks outperformed everyone else. What Enterprise 2.0 does is take these characteristics of the top performers and exposes them for everyone else in the organization.

If you force your employees to create these networks on their own with the existing offline relationships and siloed data, you’re not going to create opportunities for network improvements across the board. By making employees perspectives and work visible and searchable, you put every employee a step ahead of where they are now

I’ve got a fuller write-up over on the Connectbeam company blog. Check it out if you’re interested in developing an ROI of enterprise social software.

*****

See this post on FriendFeed: http://friendfeed.com/search?q=%22The+Revenue+Impact+of+Enterprise+2.0%22&who=everyone

About these ads

About Hutch Carpenter
Senior Consultant for HYPE Innovation (hypeinnovation.com)

10 Responses to The Revenue Impact of Enterprise 2.0

  1. Pingback: Today’s Social Media A-Listers: The Archetype of Tomorrow’s Company Leaders « I’m Not Actually a Geek

  2. Pingback: Newsletters Are Still Viable? How I Approached My First Newsletter Email « I’m Not Actually a Geek

  3. Pingback: Three Ways to Double the Value of Your Social Software « I’m Not Actually a Geek

  4. Pingback: Knuckle Sandwich » Blog Archive » Don’t Build Your Roof Before Your Walls Are Up

  5. Pingback: How I Address the Question of Enterprise 2.0 ROI « I’m Not Actually a Geek

  6. John Tropea says:

    Wow, this SNA is a great buyin strategy for e2.0 as it’s not the usual “play their game”, in trying to prove an ROI based on a process, solve a problem. Rather this focuses on how effective we are in connecting, self- organising, being autonomous. So perhaps we can say this is a strategy to put to the directors rather than the horizontal strategy as mentioned above.

    This is totally about “social productivity”, something we are currently ineffective at, which makes us also inefficient.

    When we need content or people, we go to, or email the people we know, or we search in the many repositories. There are so many studies on how much findablilty costs an organisation. And this study here is alluding to networking as a way to overcome this as you can utilise people as your filter in an online way (http://searchengineland.com/how-we-search-with-twitter-16920)

    This only half of it, it’s not just about the responsive and effectiveness in finding people and content, it’s about the quality (finding the best people and content-the diversified factor of weak ties also comes into this)…and of course we also have the self organisation, emergence, and crowdsourcing factor. This type of ecosystem makes people feel heard and recognised (talent retention), and knowledge retention by default
    http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/02/01/knowledge-retention-will-no-longer-be-an-explicit-strategy/

  7. Pingback: What Enterprise Social Networks Do Well: Produce Higher Quality Ideas « I’m Not Actually a Geek

  8. Pingback: Yep: Enterprise Social Networks Produce Higher Quality Ideas!!! « Fredzimny’s CCCCC Blog

  9. Pingback: How I Address the Question of Enterprise 2.0 ROI « Fredzimny’s CCCCC Blog

  10. Pingback: Library clips :: The ROI of time spent helping others, and performance reviews :: December :: 2009

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 641 other followers

%d bloggers like this: